- Qt Signal Slot Infinite Loop 3 Here, the signal is emitted in the worker thread, and the slot is executed in the GUI thread when control returns to the event loop. With queued connections, Qt must store a copy of the arguments that were passed to the signal so that it can pass them to the slot later on.
- The connection mechanism uses a vector indexed by signals. But all the slots waste space in the vector and there are usually more slots than signals in an object. So from Qt 4.6, a new internal signal index which only includes the signal index is used. While developing with Qt, you only need to know about the absolute method index.
Signals and slots are used for communication between objects. The signals and slots mechanism is a central feature of Qt and probably the part that differs most from the features provided by other frameworks. Signals and slots are made possible by Qt's meta-object system.
The signal and slot approach works well when the objects live in the same thread, but in this case it generates a loop as you can see in the output. What I'm expecting is the first 4 rows of the output and stop, but with this code the output is an infinite loop. Thank you for your help. Fix stack overflow due to signal infinite loop #444 rp- merged 1 commit into sqlitebrowser: master from unknown repository Nov 18, 2015 Conversation 2 Commits 1 Checks 0 Files changed.
Introduction
In GUI programming, when we change one widget, we often want another widget to be notified. More generally, we want objects of any kind to be able to communicate with one another. For example, if a user clicks a Close button, we probably want the window's close() function to be called.
Other toolkits achieve this kind of communication using callbacks. A callback is a pointer to a function, so if you want a processing function to notify you about some event you pass a pointer to another function (the callback) to the processing function. The processing function then calls the callback when appropriate. While successful frameworks using this method do exist, callbacks can be unintuitive and may suffer from problems in ensuring the type-correctness of callback arguments.
Signals and Slots
In Qt, we have an alternative to the callback technique: We use signals and slots. A signal is emitted when a particular event occurs. Qt's widgets have many predefined signals, but we can always subclass widgets to add our own signals to them. A slot is a function that is called in response to a particular signal. Qt's widgets have many pre-defined slots, but it is common practice to subclass widgets and add your own slots so that you can handle the signals that you are interested in.
The signals and slots mechanism is type safe: The signature of a signal must match the signature of the receiving slot. (In fact a slot may have a shorter signature than the signal it receives because it can ignore extra arguments.) Since the signatures are compatible, the compiler can help us detect type mismatches when using the function pointer-based syntax. The string-based SIGNAL and SLOT syntax will detect type mismatches at runtime. Signals and slots are loosely coupled: A class which emits a signal neither knows nor cares which slots receive the signal. Qt's signals and slots mechanism ensures that if you connect a signal to a slot, the slot will be called with the signal's parameters at the right time. Signals and slots can take any number of arguments of any type. They are completely type safe.
All classes that inherit from QObject or one of its subclasses (e.g., QWidget) can contain signals and slots. Signals are emitted by objects when they change their state in a way that may be interesting to other objects. This is all the object does to communicate. It does not know or care whether anything is receiving the signals it emits. This is true information encapsulation, and ensures that the object can be used as a software component.
Slots can be used for receiving signals, but they are also normal member functions. Just as an object does not know if anything receives its signals, a slot does not know if it has any signals connected to it. This ensures that truly independent components can be created with Qt.
You can connect as many signals as you want to a single slot, and a signal can be connected to as many slots as you need. It is even possible to connect a signal directly to another signal. (This will emit the second signal immediately whenever the first is emitted.)
Together, signals and slots make up a powerful component programming mechanism.
Signals
Signals are emitted by an object when its internal state has changed in some way that might be interesting to the object's client or owner. Signals are public access functions and can be emitted from anywhere, but we recommend to only emit them from the class that defines the signal and its subclasses.
When a signal is emitted, the slots connected to it are usually executed immediately, just like a normal function call. When this happens, the signals and slots mechanism is totally independent of any GUI event loop. Execution of the code following the emit
statement will occur once all slots have returned. The situation is slightly different when using queued connections; in such a case, the code following the emit
keyword will continue immediately, and the slots will be executed later.
If several slots are connected to one signal, the slots will be executed one after the other, in the order they have been connected, when the signal is emitted.
Signals are automatically generated by the moc and must not be implemented in the .cpp
file. They can never have return types (i.e. use void
).
A note about arguments: Our experience shows that signals and slots are more reusable if they do not use special types. If QScrollBar::valueChanged() were to use a special type such as the hypothetical QScrollBar::Range, it could only be connected to slots designed specifically for QScrollBar. Connecting different input widgets together would be impossible.
Slots
A slot is called when a signal connected to it is emitted. Slots are normal C++ functions and can be called normally; their only special feature is that signals can be connected to them.
Since slots are normal member functions, they follow the normal C++ rules when called directly. However, as slots, they can be invoked by any component, regardless of its access level, via a signal-slot connection. This means that a signal emitted from an instance of an arbitrary class can cause a private slot to be invoked in an instance of an unrelated class.
You can also define slots to be virtual, which we have found quite useful in practice.
Compared to callbacks, signals and slots are slightly slower because of the increased flexibility they provide, although the difference for real applications is insignificant. In general, emitting a signal that is connected to some slots, is approximately ten times slower than calling the receivers directly, with non-virtual function calls. This is the overhead required to locate the connection object, to safely iterate over all connections (i.e. checking that subsequent receivers have not been destroyed during the emission), and to marshall any parameters in a generic fashion. While ten non-virtual function calls may sound like a lot, it's much less overhead than any new
or delete
operation, for example. As soon as you perform a string, vector or list operation that behind the scene requires new
or delete
, the signals and slots overhead is only responsible for a very small proportion of the complete function call costs. The same is true whenever you do a system call in a slot; or indirectly call more than ten functions. The simplicity and flexibility of the signals and slots mechanism is well worth the overhead, which your users won't even notice.
Note that other libraries that define variables called signals
or slots
may cause compiler warnings and errors when compiled alongside a Qt-based application. To solve this problem, #undef
the offending preprocessor symbol.
A Small Example
A minimal C++ class declaration might read:
A small QObject-based class might read:
The QObject-based version has the same internal state, and provides public methods to access the state, but in addition it has support for component programming using signals and slots. This class can tell the outside world that its state has changed by emitting a signal, valueChanged()
, and it has a slot which other objects can send signals to.
All classes that contain signals or slots must mention Q_OBJECT at the top of their declaration. They must also derive (directly or indirectly) from QObject.
Slots are implemented by the application programmer. Here is a possible implementation of the Counter::setValue()
slot:
The emit
line emits the signal valueChanged()
from the object, with the new value as argument.
In the following code snippet, we create two Counter
objects and connect the first object's valueChanged()
signal to the second object's setValue()
slot using QObject::connect():
Calling a.setValue(12)
makes a
emit a valueChanged(12)
signal, which b
will receive in its setValue()
slot, i.e. b.setValue(12)
is called. Then b
emits the same valueChanged()
signal, but since no slot has been connected to b
's valueChanged()
signal, the signal is ignored.
Note that the setValue()
function sets the value and emits the signal only if value != m_value
. This prevents infinite looping in the case of cyclic connections (e.g., if b.valueChanged()
were connected to a.setValue()
).
By default, for every connection you make, a signal is emitted; two signals are emitted for duplicate connections. You can break all of these connections with a single disconnect() call. If you pass the Qt::UniqueConnectiontype, the connection will only be made if it is not a duplicate. If there is already a duplicate (exact same signal to the exact same slot on the same objects), the connection will fail and connect will return false
This example illustrates that objects can work together without needing to know any information about each other. To enable this, the objects only need to be connected together, and this can be achieved with some simple QObject::connect() function calls, or with uic
's automatic connections feature.
A Real Example
Here is a simple commented example of a widget.
LcdNumber
inherits QObject, which has most of the signal-slot knowledge, via QFrame and QWidget. It is somewhat similar to the built-in QLCDNumber widget.
The Q_OBJECT macro is expanded by the preprocessor to declare several member functions that are implemented by the moc
; if you get compiler errors along the lines of 'undefined reference to vtable for LcdNumber
', you have probably forgotten to run the moc or to include the moc output in the link command.
It's not obviously relevant to the moc, but if you inherit QWidget you almost certainly want to have the parent
argument in your constructor and pass it to the base class's constructor.
Some destructors and member functions are omitted here; the moc
ignores member functions.
LcdNumber
emits a signal when it is asked to show an impossible value.
If you don't care about overflow, or you know that overflow cannot occur, you can ignore the overflow()
signal, i.e. don't connect it to any slot.
If on the other hand you want to call two different error functions when the number overflows, simply connect the signal to two different slots. Qt will call both (in the order they were connected).
A slot is a receiving function used to get information about state changes in other widgets. LcdNumber
uses it, as the code above indicates, to set the displayed number. Since display()
is part of the class's interface with the rest of the program, the slot is public.
Several of the example programs connect the valueChanged() signal of a QScrollBar to the display()
slot, so the LCD number continuously shows the value of the scroll bar.
Note that display()
is overloaded; Qt will select the appropriate version when you connect a signal to the slot. With callbacks, you'd have to find five different names and keep track of the types yourself.
Some irrelevant member functions have been omitted from this example.
Signals And Slots With Default Arguments
The signatures of signals and slots may contain arguments, and the arguments can have default values. Consider QObject::destroyed():
When a QObject is deleted, it emits this QObject::destroyed() signal. We want to catch this signal, wherever we might have a dangling reference to the deleted QObject, so we can clean it up. A suitable slot signature might be:
To connect the signal to the slot, we use QObject::connect(). There are several ways to connect signal and slots. The first is to use function pointers:
There are several advantages to using QObject::connect() with function pointers. First, it allows the compiler to check that the signal's arguments are compatible with the slot's arguments. Arguments can also be implicitly converted by the compiler, if needed.
You can also connect to functors or C++11 lambdas:
The other way to connect a signal to a slot is to use QObject::connect() and the SIGNAL
and SLOT
macros. The rule about whether to include arguments or not in the SIGNAL()
and SLOT()
macros, if the arguments have default values, is that the signature passed to the SIGNAL()
macro must not have fewer arguments than the signature passed to the SLOT()
macro.
All of these would work:
But this one won't work:
...because the slot will be expecting a QObject that the signal will not send. This connection will report a runtime error.
Note that signal and slot arguments are not checked by the compiler when using this QObject::connect() overload.
Advanced Signals and Slots Usage
For cases where you may require information on the sender of the signal, Qt provides the QObject::sender() function, which returns a pointer to the object that sent the signal.
Lambda expressions are a convenient way to pass custom arguments to a slot:
Using Qt with 3rd Party Signals and Slots
It is possible to use Qt with a 3rd party signal/slot mechanism. You can even use both mechanisms in the same project. Just add the following line to your qmake project (.pro) file.
It tells Qt not to define the moc keywords signals
, slots
, and emit
, because these names will be used by a 3rd party library, e.g. Boost. Then to continue using Qt signals and slots with the no_keywords
flag, simply replace all uses of the Qt moc keywords in your sources with the corresponding Qt macros Q_SIGNALS (or Q_SIGNAL), Q_SLOTS (or Q_SLOT), and Q_EMIT.
See also Meta-Object System and Qt's Property System.
© 2018 The Qt Company Ltd. Documentation contributions included herein are the copyrights of their respective owners. The documentation provided herein is licensed under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.3 as published by the Free Software Foundation. Qt and respective logos are trademarks of The Qt Company Ltd. in Finland and/or other countries worldwide. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
This blog is part of a series of blogs explaining the internals of signals and slots.
In this article, we will explore the mechanisms powering the Qt queued connections.
Summary from Part 1
In the first part, we saw that signalsare just simple functions, whose body is generated by moc. They are just calling QMetaObject::activate
, with an array of pointers to arguments on the stack.Here is the code of a signal, as generated by moc: (from part 1)
QMetaObject::activate
will then look in internal data structures to find out what are the slots connected to that signal.As seen in part 1, for each slot, the following code will be executed:
So in this blog post we will see what exactly happens in queued_activate
and other parts that were skipped for the BlockingQueuedConnection
Qt Event Loop
A QueuedConnection
will post an event to the event loop to eventually be handled.
When posting an event (in QCoreApplication::postEvent
),the event will be pushed in a per-thread queue(QThreadData::postEventList
).The event queued is protected by a mutex, so there is no race conditions when threadspush events to another thread's event queue.
Once the event has been added to the queue, and if the receiver is living in another thread,we notify the event dispatcher of that thread by calling QAbstractEventDispatcher::wakeUp
.This will wake up the dispatcher if it was sleeping while waiting for more events.If the receiver is in the same thread, the event will be processed later, as the event loop iterates.
The event will be deleted right after being processed in the thread that processes it.
An event posted using a QueuedConnection is a QMetaCallEvent
. When processed, that event will call the slot the same way we call them for direct connections.All the information (slot to call, parameter values, ...) are stored inside the event.
Copying the parameters
The argv
coming from the signal is an array of pointers to the arguments. The problem is that these pointers point to the stack of the signal where the arguments are. Once the signal returns, they will not be valid anymore. So we'll have to copy the parameter values of the function on the heap. In order to do that, we just ask QMetaType. We have seen in the QMetaType article that QMetaType::create
has the ability to copy any type knowing it's QMetaType ID and a pointer to the type.
To know the QMetaType ID of a particular parameter, we will look in the QMetaObject, which contains the name of all the types. We will then be able to look up the particular type in the QMetaType database.
queued_activate
We can now put it all together and read through the code ofqueued_activate, which is called by QMetaObject::activate
to prepare a Qt::QueuedConnection
slot call.The code showed here has been slightly simplified and commented:
Upon reception of this event, QObject::event
will set the sender and call QMetaCallEvent::placeMetaCall
. That later function will dispatch just the same way asQMetaObject::activate
would do it for direct connections, as seen in Part 1
BlockingQueuedConnection
Qt Signal Slot Infinite Loop Maker
BlockingQueuedConnection
is a mix between DirectConnection
and QueuedConnection
. Like with aDirectConnection
, the arguments can stay on the stack since the stack is on the thread thatis blocked. No need to copy the arguments.Like with a QueuedConnection
, an event is posted to the other thread's event loop. The event also containsa pointer to a QSemaphore
. The thread that delivers the event will release thesemaphore right after the slot has been called. Meanwhile, the thread that called the signal will acquirethe semaphore in order to wait until the event is processed.
It is the destructor of QMetaCallEvent which will release the semaphore. This is good becausethe event will be deleted right after it is delivered (i.e. the slot has been called) but also whenthe event is not delivered (e.g. because the receiving object was deleted).
A BlockingQueuedConnection
can be useful to do thread communication when you want to invoke afunction in another thread and wait for the answer before it is finished. However, it must be donewith care.
Qt Signal Slot Infinite Loop Tutorial
The dangers of BlockingQueuedConnection
You must be careful in order to avoid deadlocks.
Obviously, if you connect two objects using BlockingQueuedConnection
living on the same thread,you will deadlock immediately. You are sending an event to the sender's own thread and then are locking thethread waiting for the event to be processed. Since the thread is blocked, the event will never beprocessed and the thread will be blocked forever. Qt detects this at run time and prints a warning,but does not attempt to fix the problem for you.It has been suggested that Qt could then just do a normal DirectConnection
if both objects are inthe same thread. But we choose not to because BlockingQueuedConnection
is something that can only beused if you know what you are doing: You must know from which thread to what other thread theevent will be sent.
The real danger is that you must keep your design such that if in your application, you do aBlockingQueuedConnection
from thread A to thread B, thread B must never wait for thread A, or you willhave a deadlock again.
When emitting the signal or calling QMetaObject::invokeMethod()
, you must not have any mutex lockedthat thread B might also try locking.
A problem will typically appear when you need to terminate a thread using a BlockingQueuedConnection
, for example in thispseudo code:
You cannot just call wait here because the child thread might have already emitted, or is about to emitthe signal that will wait for the parent thread, which won't go back to its event loop. All the thread cleanup information transfer must only happen withevents posted between threads, without using wait()
. A better way to do it would be:
The downside is that MyOperation::cleanup()
is now called asynchronously, which may complicate the design.
Qt Signal Slot Infinite Loop Tool
Conclusion
Qt Signal Slot Infinite Looper
This article should conclude the series. I hope these articles have demystified signals and slots,and that knowing a bit how this works under the hood will help you make better use of them in yourapplications.